The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has announced a major shift in its tax compliance enforcement strategy, dropping most taxpayers from the controversial “Special Table” system that has long been associated with strict compliance restrictions.
In an internal memo dated March 10 from the Compliance Management Department, the tax authority confirmed that the Special Table will no longer be broadly used as a compliance enforcement tool. Instead, it will now be reserved only for taxpayers directly involved in tax fraud or the missing trader scheme.
The decision marks a significant policy change aimed at protecting legitimate businesses that had previously been penalized through the system despite having no direct involvement in tax crimes.
Why the Special Table Was Introduced
The Special Table was originally introduced as part of KRA’s compliance programme to deter tax evasion and fraud, particularly within value-added tax (VAT) systems. Authorities used it to flag taxpayers suspected of irregularities and prevent potential abuse of the tax framework.
Business owners decry high taxation, call for intervention to spur business growth
However, according to the memo, the tool gradually evolved beyond its intended scope.
Rather than focusing only on tax fraud or missing trader networks, the system began to be applied broadly across various compliance issues. This shift, KRA acknowledged, resulted in unintended consequences for legitimate businesses.
“This has led to abuse of the tool and punishing of genuine businesspeople and taxpayers instead of facilitating them to do business and subsequently pay their fair share of taxes,” part of the memo stated.
What Changes Now
Under the new directive, most taxpayers previously listed on the Special Table will be removed unconditionally.
KRA indicated that the removal process will begin immediately, with affected taxpayers expected to be cleared from the system by Thursday, March 12, 2026. Relationship managers will notify affected taxpayers about the removal and outline the compliance expectations moving forward.
Going forward, taxpayers will only be placed on the Special Table under strict conditions. The measure will apply specifically to individuals or companies involved in:
- Missing trader schemes
-
Tax fraud or other tax-related crimes
Before any taxpayer is added to the list, both a manager and chief manager must submit a detailed description of the alleged scheme to the Deputy Commissioner for approval.
The Missing Trader Problem in VAT
The missing trader scheme remains one of the most significant VAT fraud risks facing tax authorities globally.
The scheme typically involves businesses claiming input VAT credits on transactions where the supplier either does not remit the tax to the government or does not exist at all.
KRA to validate income and expense from January 2026 tax returns
In December 2025, Ndiritu Muriithi, the chairperson of the Kenya Revenue Authority board, revealed the scale of the problem during a discussion on VAT compliance.
According to Muriithi, in March and April 2025 alone, around 9,000 businesses claimed approximately Sh39 billion in input VAT that the tax authority could not trace within its systems.
These irregular claims were a key factor behind the creation and expansion of the Special Table system.
How the Special Table Worked
When a taxpayer’s PIN was placed on the VAT Special Table, several restrictions were triggered within KRA’s digital tax systems.
Affected taxpayers were unable to file VAT returns through the system. Instead, an error message would appear stating that the PIN was under review for VAT compliance irregularities and instructing the taxpayer to contact their Tax Service Office.
The restrictions also had wider implications for business operations.
For example, traders could not claim input VAT from suppliers whose PINs had been placed on the Special Table. If a VAT return included such a supplier, the system would automatically reject the claim for input tax deduction.
In addition, system enhancements were designed to block VAT claims from nil filers, non-filers, and suspected missing traders identified through audits and intelligence reports.
Administrative Penalties and Compliance Requirements
Taxpayers who were unable to file VAT returns because of Special Table restrictions still faced administrative penalties for non-filing, which had to be addressed through KRA offices.
Businesses whose PINs were listed due to failure to transition to the electronic Tax Invoice Management System (TIMS/eTIMS) were also required to visit their Tax Service Offices for onboarding before they could resume normal filing.
Inside Tax: What you need to know about KRA’s Turnover Tax
Where suppliers had been incorrectly flagged but had already declared the sales invoice in their VAT returns, traders could apply to their Tax Service Office to have the input VAT reinstated. This process required supporting documentation in line with Section 17(2) of the VAT Act 2013.
Implications for Businesses
For many Kenyan businesses, the decision to remove most taxpayers from the Special Table is expected to ease operational bottlenecks that had previously disrupted supply chains and VAT claims.
Companies that were incorrectly flagged often struggled to transact with suppliers, claim input VAT, or complete routine tax filings.
By narrowing the use of the Special Table to cases of confirmed fraud and missing trader schemes, KRA is signaling a shift toward a more targeted enforcement model.
The move also reflects growing pressure on tax authorities to balance revenue collection with a business-friendly compliance environment.
For entrepreneurs and SMEs, the message is clear: tax enforcement is becoming more data-driven and focused on genuine fraud rather than blanket compliance restrictions.
Effective tax systems must protect government revenue without undermining legitimate enterprise. The challenge for policymakers is maintaining that balance. When enforcement tools become blunt instruments, they discourage compliance rather than encourage it. When used precisely, they reinforce trust in the system and support sustainable economic growth.
