Saturday, April 20, 2024

CFC Stanbic ordered to pay Sh. 52 million surety over unpaid tax

CFC Stanbic Bank will have to deposit a Sh51.9 million cash surety if it wants to enjoy temporary stay orders against Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA), the High Court has ruled.
The financial institution is embroiled in a legal battle with the taxman over alleged unpaid tax on a software it acquired. The court ruled that the bank should offer the guarantee within 45 days, failure to which KRA will be allowed to demand its claim. CFC moved to court protesting that it had already paid more than Sh80 million, but High Court judge Isaac Lenaola made the ruling to ensure the bank enjoys temporary orders and at the same time safeguarding KRA’s interest in the case.
The bank lost the first round in the tax case but asked the court to put on hold its verdict to allow its appeal. In the case, the bank had asked the court to restrain the taxman from collecting the monies or recovering it by attaching its accounts until the case is heard and determined. The financial institution got the relief that after the court agreed that pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, the status quo would be maintained.

And this meant that the respondent was restrained whether by themselves, agents or assigns from collecting or recovering by way of distress, attachment of the applicant’s bank accounts or by any other means whatsoever the sum of Sh51,987,891 or any sum over and above this as regards to penalties and interest in respect of software costs pending the outcome of the appeal.

But the court cautioned: “The above orders are granted on condition that within the next 45 days, the petitioner shall issue a bank guarantee to the respondents in the sum Sh51,987,891 as security should the intended appeal not succeed.”
At the centre of the legal dispute between CFC and KRA is monies that were allegedly not paid in 2010. CFC Stanbic argued that it had been given a waiver by the National Treasury and thus it did not owe the taxman anything. The court heard that if the bank was not issued with the temporary orders, its intended appeal would be rendered “useless”.

Connect With Us

320,550FansLike
14,108FollowersFollow
8,436FollowersFollow
1,900SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Stories

Related Stories